What Equity Means to Me – This February

This February, during African American History Month, I wonder what non-African Americans (98% of Oregon and 96% of Portland) will reflect on and do as part of this recognition. 

At a time when there is still much intolerance, I am now hearing from more people who want to promote better conversations about our increasingly multicultural society. 

What do we value?  Where do we point when we want examples of an equitable society? What does it look like when we get to equity? When I think of the non-profit world in which I live, I see an opportunity and a responsibility to do much more to create an equitable society. But we need to do so with intention and clarity of purpose.

I don’t ever recall a time in my 40-year career, when conversations about equity, inclusion and social justice in our society, jobs and schools, were as active as they are today. I take this as an opportunity; we should take advantage of this readiness.

Looking into my own heart, I have come to think of equity in our society as having three major components:

- Gender
- Race
- Generation

Equity is about gender balance on our boards and among our staff.  As with the other components, groups that bring gender balance to their boards and staff are more efficient, more thoughtful, and more responsive to the communities they serve and less biased in their decision making.

With regard to race and ethnic background, equity is about intentionally embracing the differences that add value to the whole. It is so important to distinguish this from the melting pot mentality of assimilation.

Assimilation is a real loss to everyone if we don’t find ways to encourage and embrace the different cultural contributions to our society.

Stereotypes – both negative and positive – are destructive to our larger society. We all know that any assumptions about any ethnic group as being “uneducated” or “poor” are harmful to our larger common good. But we also must not continually point to those who “broke out of poverty” as great exceptions. This too is one of the most destructive perspectives that many white people bring to the table. It is this majority viewpoint that keeps reinforcing the institutional racism that prevents achievement by many more persons of color.  Rather, we need to challenge ourselves as to why we have not created the supports of our privilege to make the path to success achievable by all people.  When Arthur Ashe said “Racism is not an excuse to not do the best you can,” he was referring to his own race. But it works the other way around: But being raised with privilege is not an excuse to ignore the needs of others.

When I say that equity is about generation, I’m not talking about our elders, who actually represent a less diverse and wealthier proportion of our overall population. I’m talking about our younger generation, which is a much more culturally diverse demographic than the larger American population. 

We need to erase the idea that the “baby boomers” are our most capable leaders and the holders of the correct way to do things. The newer generation has heard us say “the world we give you is not your fault, but it’s your problem.”  The boomers need to get out of the way and let the next generation of leaders step up and take over.

For one thing, the next generation of leaders does not want to lead in the way the boomers have.  Research conducted by Pew Research Center among others, shows that the “millennial” generation values work-life balance, volunteerism for the common good, and living within their needs, to a much larger degree than the boomers. Wealth accumulation while crushing others is not part of their game plan.

So, this February, as I honor African American History Month, I do so through my universal lens of equity. In fact, many of these thoughts are influenced by the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” which was largely authored by Eleanor Roosevelt.  I have this small booklet right next to my computer, and I think it will be one of the most important gifts I will give to my successor when I retire in June.



Posted by JordanElena26 on April 15th, 2010 at 08:59 PM

Different people all over the world receive the home loans from different creditors, just because this is easy.

Posted by Melinda on January 23rd, 2010 at 08:00 PM

This was a very interesting topic. I don’t think physical education has ever been given enough credit. Most P.E teachers make much less than a classroom teacher, yet their jobs are equally important. The classroom is obviously a huge part of learning, but physical education is apart of learning, and life! At a young age physical education classes teach you to get along with others, teach you skills you can use for the rest of your life, and it keeps you in good shape. So many people are becoming obese, and learning good physical activity habits starts with P.E and starts at a young age.

Posted by Janice on November 24th, 2009 at 03:35 PM

chris, i LOVED the presidential fitness program and i wore my patches proudly.  it still exists: http://www.fitness.gov/resources/index.html (BTW, nominations for their community leadership award are due feb 1, 2010).

there is a TON of research about the benefits of participation in sports/physical activity and the shortcomings of what is available.  may i invite you to visit the website of the Boston Youth Sports Initiative (http://www.bostonyouthsports.org/ResearchYouthSports.aspx), a site that i maintain, where you will find quite a bit of relevent research.  highlights:
* youth development through sport is a promising practice
* well trained coaches are better for kids
* programs need to be designed differently for different populations

Posted by Zach Hyder on October 9th, 2009 at 12:15 PM

Great thoughts and comments on this issue. We’ll continue to wrestle with this issue of physical activity in schools given state and local budgets will be hit hard in this economy. This is a national issue, and one that requires we rethink not what, but how we are teaching in schools. Adults serve as a poor model in our daily routines: desk-centric regimens that don’t take advantage of learning opportunities that involve physical activity. If we consider making learning more interACTIVE (not meaning using digital technology), we could integrate physical education into their core education activities.

Posted by solitude on June 18th, 2009 at 10:08 PM

Thanks for your kind information. I like your blog very much because of its interesting topics. Like healthy food and exercise etc.

Posted by Andrew Plambeck on January 22nd, 2009 at 06:01 PM

Physical education, like most education, should not be the filling of a bucket but the lighting of a fire. This should be fostered in K-12 education, but options need to be available for students of higher education.

The University of Oregon has a number of courses in physical education ranging from yoga to running to weightlifting. There are also multiple opportunities to join intramural sports teams, but we are always striving for more.

At the ASUO, we are working on ways to expand our bike loan program, which offers short-term bicycle use for students. We will continue to fight for upstream health priorities for the campus community as part of our effort to promote a healthy student body and a healthy Oregon.

Andrew Plambeck
Communications Director
Associated Students of the University of Oregon

Posted by 5 Components of Physical Fitness on January 18th, 2009 at 01:24 AM

This is a very important post and a good point, the phys ed programs are definitely lacking nowadays - certainly my kids are not doing the same things we did to stay fit and healthy. Hopefully it will change though.

Posted by liv on December 29th, 2008 at 02:43 PM

i would love to see sports that were affordable.  if a kid wants to play any sort of organized sports, which builds good relationship skills as well as being physically active, parents have to come up with ridiculous amounts of money.  there has to be a way to earn through sweat equity a way to play.

Posted by Tess Swift on December 25th, 2008 at 03:33 PM

Safety is a big factor.  I grew up on a ranch and worked hard for my “exercise”, but even the kids in town played hard.  outside.  with each other.  We’d all come home from school and be gone, outside, until Mom yelled “time for dinner.”  But in today’s society it’s not safe, or legal, to let your 8/9 yr olds wander the neighborhood w/o adult supervision.  I wonder if my Mom would get in trouble today for letting me walk the 1/3 mile to the barn to milk the cow on my own while Dad was out of town?  But safely, and busy schedules aside… we still can show our kids how fun exercise can be by starting a game of tag with them, or tossing a football instead of beating them (or in my case being beaten) at a computer game.  Turning off the TV, getting off our bottoms and going outside is FUN!  Let’s show ‘em! grin

10  Posted by Cindy Ertle on December 9th, 2008 at 08:56 PM

Behavior change is hard. We need to increase physical movement among children and families by doing two things:
1) Increase the number of minutes spent each day in PE class and in fun intramural activities.
Fund those first and elite/competitive athletics second !
2) Increase the availability and participation in community physical activity opportunities.
We need safe bicycle lanes and protection from traffic.
We need safe and accessible parks.

11  Posted by Holly Larsen on December 8th, 2008 at 10:03 AM

I definitely vote for a better bike and walking infrastructure! As a walker I am always afraid that some one’s car is going to plow into me. When I am driving I am so worried that I am going to hit some cyclist on his/her way to work. Building a safer bike and walking infrastructure would maybe get people to use their bikes and feet instead of their cars. First, though, you would have to promote the benefits of actually moving. Why walk to the movies when you can sit on the couch and order pay-per-view? Americans desperately need a lifestyle overhaul.

12  Posted by Melissa Sircy on December 1st, 2008 at 03:53 PM

I know this is kind of ironic to bring up in a conversation about less TV/more exercise, but here goes…the movie Wall-E depicts American society’s demise because of our unhealthy choices - buy more, supersize, etc. It’s a kids’ movie with a bigger message, not that I condone watching it in place of physical activity! Its good see these topics are getting more mainstream attention, now its time for action!!

13  Posted by D. Dow on November 6th, 2008 at 01:37 PM

I think we are reaping the “rewards” of deregulation and libertarianism. I think we now, unfortunately, forget that for much of our nation’s youth we were “forced” to do things we hated like eat our vegetables, go outside and get some exercise, do our chores, practice the violin and walk to school through the snow for five miles, and have to take a bus downtown to see a movie. Food and entertainment is now so ubiquitous and relatively cheap which means that people not otherwise motivated to exercise don’t and don’t have to. It’s not just kids but our whole country is going to be the most obese country on earth pretty soon. If nothing is regulated (food, schools, workplaces), or paid for (taxes going to fund school PE programs and not just the bare necessities like four walls and out-of-date textbooks) and we are “free,” (to sit around and play videogames and drink sodas) to be unhealthy then it’s no surprise we are unhealthy. I hope with this new administration and our current (un)health there is a real sea change.

14  Posted by Jake Ostrow on October 29th, 2008 at 02:58 AM

Those statistics really don’t surprise me much. When I look back on middle and high school, I recall a lot of people not participating in PE classes; they would just sit there and watch everything.

Somehow we need to create a system that helps get everyone involved in being active in schools.
However, I think that the food being served in schools also needs to be carefully looked at when studying child obesity.

15  Posted by S. Rhee on June 26th, 2008 at 03:10 PM

The topic of PE may not get some people excited, but when you learn that “childhood obesity threatens to make this generation of American children the first to have a shorter life span than their parents,” I can’t imagine anyone not sitting up and taking notice. 

There is an article titled “Obesity Threatens a Generation” from May 17, 2008 that talks more about this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/05/09/ST2008050900425.html

16  Posted by Chris Palmedo on June 10th, 2008 at 12:19 PM

As part of this CHP project, I conducted interviews with representatives of the Oregon media to learn more about how they report on health and public health. When I asked an esteemed Portland reporter what he thought we could do better, he said, we need to do a better job of “marketing” fitness. “I’m thinking of the presidential physical fitness contest when I was a kid. You remember that?” he asked. He went on: “Wasn’t that exciting? Wasn’t that exciting to do the shuttle run? That was an example of a brilliant marketing campaign. It was something that got a lot of kids interested in fitness.”

Makes me wonder…What ever happened to that program?




Join the conversation. Leave a comment.

Name: (required)

Email: (required) will not be published

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Submit the word you see below:


Back to main